LiveAccessibility is in the product today
Accessibility
Accessibility
Evidences the completion-parity gap between learners with recorded accommodations and those without, plus the mix of accommodation types and accessibility features in use. This is a protected-attribute surface: accommodation status is sensitive personal data, so aggregates are small-cell suppressed and the row-level table sits behind the surface permission with audit logging. Works with LearnNoow and Moodle.
Captured from the product
The accessibility screen, as it actually looks
These are screenshots of the real cards, filled with the synthetic dataset the demo runs on. Yours draw from your own LMS.
Comparative completion
Accommodated vs non-accommodated completion per group.
Accommodation types
In-scope learners holding each recorded accommodation type.
Accessibility-feature usage
In-scope learners with each accessibility feature recorded in use (captions, screen reader, alt formats, etc.).
Learners with accommodations
Authorised row-level detail: per learner, accommodation type(s), courses enrolled/completed, completion % and delta vs scope average.
In detail
What is on this screen
5 cards, each with an info tooltip that states what it shows and how it is counted. The same explanation appears in the product and in this list.
Accessibility KPI strip
Completion (accommodated), completion (non-accommodated), completion parity gap (pp), learners with accommodations (+share).
Comparative completion
Accommodated vs non-accommodated completion per group.
Accommodation types
In-scope learners holding each recorded accommodation type.
Accessibility-feature usage
In-scope learners with each accessibility feature recorded in use (captions, screen reader, alt formats, etc.).
Learners with accommodations
Authorised row-level detail: per learner, accommodation type(s), courses enrolled/completed, completion % and delta vs scope average.
Questions
How this screen is computed from the product's own documentation.
What does the accessibility screen show?
Evidences the completion-parity gap between learners with recorded accommodations and those without, plus the mix of accommodation types and accessibility features in use. This is a protected-attribute surface: accommodation status is sensitive personal data, so aggregates are small-cell suppressed and the row-level table sits behind the surface permission with audit logging. Comparison-dependent cards render an honest priming state until accommodation records exist, never a degenerate 0%-vs-real chart.
How is accessibility kpi strip worked out?
Completion (accommodated), completion (non-accommodated), completion parity gap (pp), learners with accommodations (+share)
How is comparative completion worked out?
Accommodated vs non-accommodated completion per group
How is accommodation types worked out?
In-scope learners holding each recorded accommodation type
How is accessibility-feature usage worked out?
In-scope learners with each accessibility feature recorded in use (captions, screen reader, alt formats, etc.)
How is learners with accommodations worked out?
Authorised row-level detail: per learner, accommodation type(s), courses enrolled/completed, completion % and delta vs scope average
Which plan includes it?
The Government pack, sold from Business and up. Every card on it carries an Ask AI action and an info tooltip, on every plan that includes the screen.
Which platforms does LearnBoard support?
LearnNoow and Moodle. Connect either one read-only and the same dashboards, charts, alerts and AI answers run on it. Nothing is installed on LearnNoow; Moodle has two free companion plugins.
See accessibility on your own LMS
One read-only connection and this screen fills with your figures. Accessibility is in the Government pack, sold from Business and up.
Built for LearnNoow and Moodle.